【對(duì)應(yīng)原文】:As the hacking trial concludes—finding guilty one ex-editor of the News of the World, Andy Coulson, for conspiring to hack phones, and finding his predecessor, Rebekah Brooks, innocent of the same charge—the wider issue of dearth of integrity still stands. Journalists are known to have hacked the phones of up to 5,500 people. This is hacking on an industrial scale, as was acknowledged by Glenn Mulcaire, the man hired by the News of the World in 2001 to be the point person for phone hacking. Others await trial. This saga still unfolds.
【題目】:It can be inferred from Paragraph 3 that .
(A) Glenn Mulcaire may deny phone hacking as a crime.
(B) more journalists may be found guilty of phone hacking.
(C) Andy Coulson should be held innocent of the charge.
(D) phone hacking will be accepted on certain occasions.
【解析】:對(duì)照原文,文章中提到Andy Coulson,但是并沒(méi)有提到他對(duì)手機(jī)黑客的態(tài)度,所以排除A選項(xiàng);文中提到侵入手機(jī)的記者已經(jīng)高達(dá)5500,并且Others await trial(其他人也在候?qū)?可以得知可能會(huì)有更多的記者會(huì)因?yàn)榍秩胧謾C(jī)而被判定有罪,也就是B選項(xiàng);而C選項(xiàng)的innocent of the charge和D選項(xiàng)的will be accepted on certain occasions屬于無(wú)中生有。正確選項(xiàng)為B。